Mapping Twitter Topic Networks From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Polarized Crowds Political conversations on Twitter. Conversations on Twitter create networks with identifiable contours as people reply to and mention one another in their tweets. These conversational structures differ, depending on the subject and the people driving the conversation. Six structures are regularly observed divided, unified, fragmented, clustered, and inward and outward hub and spoke structures. These are created as individuals choose whom to reply to or mention in their Twitter messages and the structures tell a story about the nature of the conversation. Six Samurai, known as Six Warmen Roku Bush in the OCG, is an archetype of Warrior monsters that. Archetypal literary criticism is a type of critical theory that interprets a text by focusing on recurring myths and archetypes from the Greek arch, beginning. Jills List of Character Archetypes A character archetype is a pattern or model from which similar characters are based. Sometime last year, I noticed that. Archetypal definition, of or having the nature of an archetype, or original model or prototype an archetypal evil stepmother. See more. Understanding the Archetypes involving the eight functions of type Beebe model The key to understanding exactly how functions play out in each of MBTIs 16 types is. If a topic is political, it is common to see two separate, polarized crowds take shape. They form two distinct discussion groups that mostly do not interact with each other. Frequently these are recognizably liberal or conservative groups. The participants within each separate group commonly mention very different collections of website URLs and use distinct hashtags and words. The split is clearly evident in many highly controversial discussions people in clusters that we identified as liberal used URLs for mainstream news websites, while groups we identified as conservative used links to conservative news websites and commentary sources. At the center of each group are discussion leaders, the prominent people who are widely replied to or mentioned in the discussion. In polarized discussions, each group links to a different set of influential people or organizations that can be found at the center of each conversation cluster. While these polarized crowds are common in political conversations on Twitter, it is important to remember that the people who take the time to post and talk about political issues on Twitter are a special group. Six Archetypes' title='Six Archetypes' />Unlike many other Twitter members, they pay attention to issues, politicians, and political news, so their conversations are not representative of the views of the full Twitterverse. Moreover, Twitter users are only 1. Their demographic profile is not reflective of the full population. Additionally, other work by the Pew Research Center has shown that tweeters reactions to events are often at odds with overall public opinion sometimes being more liberal, but not always. Six Archetypes' title='Six Archetypes' />Finally, forthcoming survey findings from Pew Research will explore the relatively modest size of the social networking population who exchange political content in their network. Still, the structure of these Twitter conversations says something meaningful about political discourse these days and the tendency of politically active citizens to sort themselves into distinct partisan camps. Social networking maps of these conversations provide new insights because they combine analysis of the opinions people express on Twitter, the information sources they cite in their tweets, analysis of who is in the networks of the tweeters, and how big those networks are. And to the extent that these online conversations are followed by a broader audience, their impact may reach well beyond the participants themselves. Our approach combines analysis of the size and structure of the network and its sub groups with analysis of the words, hashtags and URLs people use. Each person who contributes to a Twitter conversation is located in a specific position in the web of relationships among all participants in the conversation. Some people occupy rare positions in the network that suggest that they have special importance and power in the conversation. Social network maps of Twitter crowds and other collections of social media can be created with innovative data analysis tools that provide new insight into the landscape of social media. These maps highlight the people and topics that drive conversations and group behavior insights that add to what can be learned from surveys or focus groups or even sentiment analysis of tweets. Maps of previously hidden landscapes of social media highlight the key people, groups, and topics being discussed. Conversational archetypes on Twitter. The Polarized Crowd network structure is only one of several different ways that crowds and conversations can take shape on Twitter. There are at least six distinctive structures of social media crowds which form depending on the subject being discussed, the information sources being cited, the social networks of the people talking about the subject, and the leaders of the conversation. Each has a different social structure and shape divided, unified, fragmented, clustered, and inward and outward hub and spokes. After an analysis of many thousands of Twitter maps, we found six different kinds of network crowds. Click to view detail. Polarized Crowd Polarized discussions feature two big and dense groups that have little connection between them. The topics being discussed are often highly divisive and heated political subjects. In fact, there is usually little conversation between these groups despite the fact that they are focused on the same topic. Polarized Crowds on Twitter are not arguing. They are ignoring one another while pointing to different web resources and using different hashtags. Six Archetypes' title='Six Archetypes' />Why this matters It shows that partisan Twitter users rely on different information sources. While liberals link to many mainstream news sources, conservatives link to a different set of websites. Click to to view detail. Tight Crowd These discussions are characterized by highly interconnected people with few isolated participants. Many conferences, professional topics, hobby groups, and other subjects that attract communities take this Tight Crowd form. Why this matters These structures show how networked learning communities function and how sharing and mutual support can be facilitated by social media. Click to view detail. Brand Clusters When well known products or services or popular subjects like celebrities are discussed in Twitter, there is often commentary from many disconnected participants These isolates participating in a conversation cluster are on the left side of the picture on the left. The Six Main Arcs in Storytelling, as Identified by an A. I. A machine mapped the most frequently used emotional trajectories in fiction, and compared them with the. An analysis based on C. G. Jung, Camille Paglia, Deborah Tannen, and John Gray. Join Bang2writers on Facebook Bang2writers is a safe, supportive space for writers to chat about writing ask for advice post inspiration share links including. Well known brands and other popular subjects can attract large fragmented Twitter populations who tweet about it but not to each other. The larger the population talking about a brand, the less likely it is that participants are connected to one another. Brand mentioning participants focus on a topic, but tend not to connect to each other. Why this matters There are still institutions and topics that command mass interest. Often times, the Twitter chatter about these institutions and their messages is not among people connecting with each other. The Our Zombies Are Different trope as used in popular culture. The word zombie originated in the voudon beliefs of the Caribbean and West Africa. Inside Out is Pixars fifteenth feature film. It is directed by Pete Docter and codirected by. Rather, they are relaying or passing along the message of the institution or person and there is no extra exchange of ideas. Click to view detail. Community Clusters Some popular topics may develop multiple smaller groups, which often form around a few hubs each with its own audience, influencers, and sources of information. These Community Clusters conversations look like bazaars with multiple centers of activity. Global news stories often attract coverage from many news outlets, each with its own following. That creates a collection of medium sized groupsand a fair number of isolates the left side of the picture above. Why this matters Some information sources and subjects ignite multiple conversations, each cultivating its own audience and community. Learner Papers How Organizational Archetypes Manifest at Each Level of the Gravesian Value Systems. How Organizational Archetypes Manifest at Each Level of the Gravesian Value Systems. Jorge Taborga. Abstract. Organizational culture provides the impetus for the behaviors in an organization which work to fulfill its mission or work against it. Schein 2. 01. 0 stratifies culture into artifacts, values and beliefs, and underlying assumptions. The latter are the deeper and unexamined values that contain the models of behavior resulting from the shared experiences of the organization as it solves problems and which are taught to all its members. According to Jungian organizational depth psychology, as documented by Corlette Pearson 2. These complexes are formed through organizational experiences patterned by the psychic energy of archetypes as they take form through the minds of individuals and collectives. Dr. Clare Graves spent most of his professional life researching and ultimately developing theories for the value systems that associate different life conditions with the mental capacities that emerge in humans as they solve problems Lee, 2. He named his research the Emergent Cyclical Levels of Existence Theories ECLET. His theories have been popularized by Beck Cowan 1. Spiral Dynamics. Cowan Todorovic 2. Gravesian value systems to the underlying assumptions inside an organization which are largely responsible for organizational cultures. This essay explores the connections between archetypes and the value systems of an organization as a way to arrive at a deeper understanding of the emergence of organizational culture. Each archetype is explored as a pattern of behavior at each level of the ECLET value systems. Autocad Electrical How To Draw Electrical Schematic. An archetypal correspondence map is articulated for three of the most common Gravesian value systems found in modern and post modern organizations. This correspondence is validated through a case study of a small consulting company. The case study provides a framework for the analysis on how archetypes are manifested in an organization and how the emerging culture can be interpreted through the lens of value systems. The correspondence of archetypes to values systems explored here provides an approach to a deeper understanding of the emergence of organizational culture. As presented in this essay, this approach is far from being a repeatable method of cultural assessment and much less for intervention. However, it is a start to further research which has the potential for shining light into the organizational unconscious and in particular into the effects that archetypes have on underlying assumptions value systems. This new light could emerge as a way to assess organizational culture and to determine interventions that would bring culture into greater alignment with the fulfillment of the organizations mission. Introduction. Organizations are complex entities, both socially and psychologically. There is also a broad biological element given the neurology of the diversity of humans involved. This bio psycho social milieu makes each organization unique, yet they all seem to operate following common patterns of behavior. Strategic plans, Management by Objectives MBOs, career development plans, performance reviews, budgets, project plans, employee meetings and a host of other practices can be found across most enterprises. Teamwork, consensus, entrepreneurship, bureaucracy, power play, gossiping, scapegoating, and back stabbing are also behaviors that reside in the depths of organizations and either help or hinder their missions, and either uplift the humans in these organizations or oppress them. Schein 2. 01. 0 posits that the culture of an organization determines its actions. He defines culture as A pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well enough to be considered valid and therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems. This definition by Schein corresponds to two concepts that will be used throughout this essay life conditions and mental capacities. These concepts were introduced by the research of Dr. Clare W. Graves and are documented in the book The Never Ending Quest Cowan Todorovic, 2. Dr. Graves developed what he called Emergent Cyclical Levels of Existence Theory ECLET. In this theory, humans are exposed to a variety of life conditions Scheins problems which give way to mental capacities to solve them Scheins basic assumptions. In Graves theory, human development can be grouped into value systems that are in agreement with what has worked well to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members Schein, 2. This is the culture or the value systems of individuals in an organization or a much larger social system like a country or a particular ethnicity. Schein 2. 01. 0 describes culture in three layers artifacts, values and beliefs, and underlying assumptions. The artifacts are the physical manifestations that tell how the organization is conducting its affairs. Artifacts would include a companys P L, its products and services, its workplaces, the pictures on the walls, the types of cups used for coffee, and the t shirts sporting a catchy slogan given to employees after a product launch. Artifacts are the focus of cultural archeology. Much can be interpreted from their analysis but only superficial theories can be derived about the behaviors of the humans in the organization. In contrast, value and beliefs correspond to a deeper level of culture. It is the set of shared learning and experiences by an organization. It started with the leader and then became a shared experience. As values are repeated in solving problems, they take on the flavor of underlying assumptions. These assumptions become the internal, reflective muscle of how individuals inside an organization are not only expected to behave but are perpetuated by every action. Even though organizations have a relatively transient population with each member bringing their own set of underlying assumptions, organizational culture normalizes each into a shared set that defines how the organization responds to the problems it faces every day. Graves studied underlying assumptions starting in the 1. Cowan Todorovic, 2. He leveraged his students and their lives to capture the data necessary for his research. Graves did not start with a theory about the emergent levels of existence how individuals cope with problems rather he let the collected data generate a theory. His research started as he wrestled with questions from his psychology students at Union College in New York on which theory of human psychology was correct. He taught a psychology survey class which introduced students to a variety of theories, from Freuds to Maslows. Graves research was simple in structure. He asked each student to write a short essay describing the mature adult personality in operation. After collecting a large number of these essays he reportedly ended up with about 4. He grouped the similar responses into clusters, which gave way to the 8 value systems in ECELT. This theory was popularized by Beck Cowans book Spiral dynamics Mastering values, leadership and change 1. Incidentally, both Beck and Cowan worked with Dr. Graves and have continued his work both in application and teaching.